Parliamentary System Notes
The Parliamentary System is a system of governance where the executive is responsible to the legislature. India follows the British Westminster Model of parliamentary democracy.
Meaning of Parliamentary System
- The President is the nominal head (constitutional head).
- The Prime Minister is the real head (executive head).
- The Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha.
- The government remains in power as long as it enjoys the confidence of the Parliament.
Key Features:
- Fusion of powers between executive and legislature.
- Collective responsibility of ministers.
- Leadership of the Prime Minister.
- Dissolution of the Lower House possible.
Features of the Parliamentary System in India
Difference Between Parliamentary and Presidential Systems
Why India Chose the Parliamentary System?
- Ensures responsible government.
- Prevents authoritarianism by ensuring executive accountability.
- Suitable for India’s diverse society (encourages coalitions and representation).
Merits and Demerits of the Parliamentary System
Merits of the Parliamentary System
- Ensures responsible government – The executive is accountable to the legislature.
- Prevents dictatorship – Power is distributed between the legislature and executive.
- Flexibility – The government can be changed without a full election if it loses confidence.
- Representation of diverse groups – Coalition governments allow power-sharing among regions and communities.
Demerits of the Parliamentary System
- Unstable government – Coalition politics often leads to instability (e.g., 1996-1998).
- Lack of leadership continuity – Frequent changes in government can disrupt long-term policies.
- Party politics dominates – MPs must follow the party line due to the Anti-Defection Law.
- Executive dominance – The PM and cabinet may overpower the Parliament.
- Example: In 1975, Indira Gandhi declared an Emergency, reducing Parliament’s power.
Features That Make India’s Parliamentary System Unique
Key Takeaway: India has a more structured and regulated parliamentary system than the UK.
Constitutional Provisions Related to the Parliamentary System
Criticism of India’s Parliamentary System
- Criticism of India’s Parliamentary System
- Executive dominance over the legislature (PMO has more power).
- Anti-Defection Law limits MPs’ individual decision-making.
- Slow decision-making due to multiple political approvals.
- Example: The fall of the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government in 1999 due to loss of majority.
Key Takeaways for UPSC
- India follows the British Parliamentary System (Westminster Model).
- The President is the nominal head, and the PM is the real head.
- The Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha.
- Unlike the UK, India has a written Constitution, judicial review, and an elected President.
- Advantages: Accountability, representation, prevents dictatorship.
- Disadvantages: Political instability, executive dominance, party politics.